From: Tarin Clanuwat CLICKTA COM> Date: 28 oct 2002 Subject: Re: Oriental players? Interesting topic, but I don't see any useful things discussing about being oriental or non-oriental players though. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Kaufman" COMCAST NET> To: TECHUNIX TECHNION AC IL> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: Re: Oriental players? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Sams" PARKCITY NE JP> > To: TECHUNIX TECHNION AC IL> > Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:48 PM > Subject: Oriental players? > > > > In his recent report on the Tokyo International Forum (posted on > October > > 23), Larry Kaufman made the following comment on the results: > > > > "The remarkable thing about the results was that not one of the > > Oriental players made it to the four-way tie for first! The Japanese > > and Brazilian (ethnic Japanese) players were thought to be among the > > favorites, and there were also Oriental players from China, Thailand, > > and Paraguay. So the results were a great success for Shogi in the > > West. Furthermore, even among the players with 3-2, the two top > > finishers on tie-break were non-Orientals!" > > > > I am rather surprised that Larry should put all "Oriental" players in the > > same category. While the Japanese and Brazilian (ethnic Japanese) players > > have an obvious cultural advantage regarding Shogi, the players from China > > and Thailand are essentially in the same situation as players from the > West. > > Both countries have their own versions of chess - Chinese chess > (shiang-chi) > > and Thai chess (makruk) - so they are not much more likely than Westerners > > to encounter Shogi. The Japanese tend to think that Chinese people have an > > advantage over Westerners in learning Shogi because they can read kanji > > (Chinese characters), but I haven't met any players from Europe who had > much > > difficulty remembering or identifying the eight Shogi pieces! > > > > > > Richard Sams > > I believe that the Chinese have a big advantage over us Westerners in > terms of being able to access Japanese literature. It's true that spoken > Japanese and Chinese have little in common, but since they use many of the > same Kanji I would imagine that a Chinese person could somewhat understand > what a Japanese magazine or book was saying about a position without having > to know any Japanese at all. Also, many more Chinese now play shogi than > all westerners combined, perhaps because they are not discouraged by the > Kanji. Regarding the Thai written language, I must plead ignorance. > > Larry >