From: Reg Tanaban HOTMAIL COM> Date: 9 nov 2002 Subject: Re: notation My personal preference is with the numbers, e.g., "P76", since it's closer to the original Japanese notational system (which uses Arabic numerals along one axis and kanji numeral along the other), so that it's easier to cross-reference Japanese shogi literature, and also it's easier for me to visualize the board (when I did 2-D graphs in math, they were both numerical axes; not alphabetical). Also, having had a friend in Japan videotape for me a bunch of those NHK shogi speed tournaments, I got used to hearing "hichi roku fu" ("seven six pawn") etc. I'm not sure why the alphabetical system was adopted; just the historical circumstance of having chess players interesting themselves in shogi, and trying to create a more "chess-like" notational system? I play chess and like the algebraic notational system, but as applied in shogi the numbers and alphabets are going in different directions, so while I can visualize the chess board with algebraic notation, I've about given up doing that on shogi. Then again, I find notation like "G7h" confusing because my first impulse is still to think of "G" as "Gin" - "Silver" in Japanese - and not "G" for "Gold"! Again, probably from those NHK shogi video tapes with "hichi hachi gin" ("seven eight silver"), etc. Good thing we have those shogi board applets! Now if only there was a way to play out some of those long analyses in the notes over the applet board, problems in notational differences will become a very minor point, at least for me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Andrews" JUNO COM> To: TECHUNIX TECHNION AC IL> Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: Re: notation > My preference is for the notation with the letters eg. P7f. > Also promotion is indicated by + > declined promotion is indicated by = > and drops are indicated by ' > > ________________________________________________________________ > Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today > Only $9.95 per month! > Visit www.juno.com >