From: Rikard Nordgren <e7rikard <at> ETEK <dot> CHALMERS <dot> SE>
Date: 1 mar 2001
Subject: Re: Results from Stockholm Open 2001

>                     NatGra                         P SosSdoCum
> 1.T. Angqvist       S  2k  2+  12+ 6+  7-  4+  9+  5 23 19 18
> 2.K. Hosokawa       J  3d  1-  21+ 20+ 10+ 5+  7+  5 18 13 15
> 3.T. Inui           J  4d  18+ 9-  22+ 11+ 6+  4+  5 17 14 16
> 4.T. Shimizu        J  3d  13+ 11+ 7+  9+  1-  3-  4 23 13 18
> 5.T. Christoffersen N  1d  8+  6-  12+ 16+ 2-  10+ 4 21 12 14
> 6.C.J. Nilsson      S  2d  20+ 5+  1-  14+ 3-  11+ 4 21 11 15
> 7.J. Palmgren       S  5k  16+ 24+ 4-  1+  9+  2-  4 20 11 16
> 8.Y. Suzuki         J  4d  5-  20- 21+ 23+ 17+ 15+ 4 12  7 10
> 9.M. Danerud        S  2d  15+ 3+  14+ 4-  7-  1-  3 24 11 15
> 10.A. Rapmund       N  3k  14- 17+ 15+ 2-  16+ 5-  3 19  7 11
> 11.R. Bjerke        N  3k  19+ 4-  24+ 3-  14+ 6-  3 19  6 12
> 12.P. Kaneko        S  3d  21+ 1-  5-  0-  19+ 18+ 3 17  5  9
> 13.F. Rouhani       S  8k  4-  19+ 16- 0+  15- 17+ 3 16  7  9
> 14.J. Sandbom       S  3k  10+ 22+ 9-  6-  11- 16+ 3 16  6 12
> 15.M. Jansson       S  8k  9-  18+ 10- 0+  13+ 8-  3 16  6 10
> 16.A. Olufsen       N  3k  7-  23+ 13+ 5-  10- 14- 2 18  4  9
> 17.P. Kristiansson  S  7k  22- 10- 18+ 19+ 8-  13- 2 15  4  7
> 18.A. Vidal         S  5k  3-  15- 17- 21+ 23+ 12- 2 15  2  5
> 19.M. Albertsson    S  6k  11- 13- 23+ 17- 12- 21+ 2 13  2  5
> 20.Y. Hosone        J  3d  6-  8+  2-  0-  0-  0-  1 16  4  5
> 21.T. Juntti        S 13k  12- 2-  8-  18- 0+  19- 1 16  0  2
> 22.M. Mikami        J  1d  17+ 14- 3-  0-  0-  0-  1 11  2  6
> 23.R. Lindkvist     S 12k  24- 16- 19- 8-  18- 0+  1 11  0  1
> 24.T. Ito           J  1d  23+ 7-  11- 0-  0-  0-  1  9  1  6

About this score table: Mr Ito (24) won the game vs. Mr Lindkvist they
both have
the same score. Isn't it strange that Lindkvist is before Ito in the
final score? Isn't the
higher SOS here irrelevant?

Rikard Nordgren