From: Larry Kaufman WIZARD NET> Date: 6 sep 2000 Subject: Re: Time limits At 03:51 PM 9/6/00 +0200, DANERUD MARTIN wrote: >Your information that "increment time" indeed could be used for rating games in the USA is very interesting! Is it >the same in Europe? Even in chess in the U.S., there is still discussion going on as to whether increment (as contrasted to delay) is currently approved for rated play or whether a separate ruling is needed. So I suppose that for FESA someone should clarify the point; logically increment should be ratable, but depending on how your rules are written a legally-minded person might have an objection. What do you think would be a suitable time for shogi games with approximately the same total >playing time as for 1 hour + 30 s byo-yomi? My proposal would be 15 min + 1 min increment, which would result in >(15 + 50) x 2 minutes = 130 minutes for a 50 moves (100 "Japanese" moves) game. In the organiser nightmare >game with (15 + 80) x 2 minutes = 190 minutes for an 80 moves (160) game, that would result in just a small >delay from a three hours per round schedule. The same game at 1 hour + 30s would probably last about 140 minutes, so this is a huge difference. The schedule you use is irrelevant to the comparison. So I would say your proposal is too slow. In my opinion the increment does not need to be so much, because some moves are obvious which allows for more time on the hard moves. So let's try a 30" increment. If our base time is 30', then after 60 moves each we have used the same 1 hour as originally stipulated. However the remaining moves would take a bit more time, because some byoyomi moves are made in less than the max. time. So 30' + 30" increment would be slightly slower than 1 hour + 30" byo, but much faster than your proposal. However the quality of game would be much higher than 1 hour + 30" byo, probably nearly as high as 1 hour + 1 minute byoyomi. So this is my recommendation for you. >Sincerely yours, > >Dr. Martin Danerud > >President of the Swedish Shogi Federation, Vice President of FESA > > Regards, Larry