From: Larry Kaufman WIZARD NET> Date: 27 may 2000 Subject: Re: A World Shogi Federation and a real World Championship At 12:36 PM 5/27/00 +0200, you wrote: >Ultimately, the Shogi community as a whole may regard one or the >other tournament the real World Championship. As in Chess, it may be >that some people regard the Ryu O the strongest player, while others >think the Meijin is. > The Meijin could well be the strongest player, but only the Ryu-O has some claim to being the world champion, since a non-Japanese or even a Japanese amateur cannot become Meijin. The Meijin may be considered the World's professional champion. >There are no objective criteria by which one can establish what the >real championship is; it is ultimately mostly a matter of taste. >Larry argued that "for the first time in history, it [a world >championship] now exists" as every Shogi player in the world has the >opportunity to become Ryu O. However, this is factually not entirely >accurate, nor is it objectively true that that makes it a world >championship. If there was a 10-dan in, say, on Kiribati, but there >were fewer than 12 players there, he could not have qualified for the >WSC in New York. Sorry Pieter, my statement was right and yours is wrong. Any player outside Japan was eligible for the New York event; it is only the free trip that the imaginary player from Kiribati could not have won. He could still have played. Also, there is the question whether a Championship >is Championship when only the best player emerges or when the best >two (or 4 or 8 etc.) players contest the final: Egoshi (Brasil) and >Ito (Thailand) may be the best two players in the world, but only >Egoshi will have a chance to prove that. > This amounts to saying that a knockout is not a valid World Championship. While I am no fan of the knockout system, it is still a legitimate system to choose a champion, though there are better ones. The Meijin challenger is chosen by a round robin of ten top players, and historically I think the Meijin is more often the strongest player than the Ryu-O. >As to the issue of a "World Shogi Federation," again anybody can >start such an organization and organize a WSC. However, nobody may >accept their authority. Since NSR represents the vast majority of >Shogi players, by default they are the World Federation unless they >agree to be involved in a separate organization that they recognize >as the "World Shogi Federation." > I agree. >So far, I have not indicated my personal preference. It is very >simple. To my mind, an amateur World Championship should be organized >under the auspices of a world organization, but if such an >organization does not exist, the combined inter(national) >organizations, such as NSR, USSF, FESA, etc. should agree on how to >do it and should have the ultimate responsability. > I agree here too. >Ciao, > >Pieter > Larry Kaufman