From: Steve Evans <trout <at> NETSPACE <dot> NET <dot> AU>
Date: 22 feb 1999
Subject: Re: Solution to D29 (correction)

Colin Paul Adams wrote:

> Hm. I made a mistake with my variation (which now becomes the main
> line, as Steve's line is not the best defence, and so becomes the
> variation).
>
> 35. Rx12i,  K-11l,
> 36. R-11i,  K-12k (or +SM-11k, +Bx11k mate)
> 37. L-12d+, +SM-12j
> 38. +B-11l mate.
>

Sorry Colin, but:

35. Rx12i,  K-11l;
36. R-12l,  mate.

...is the result here. ;-)

>
> So 38 moves after all (or 39 if you interpose the FL (a la Evans)).
>

Back to 37 (or maybe 38).

SE