From: michael facer <michaelf <at> LAVA <dot> NET>
Date: 15 may 1996
Subject: Re: Meijin match game 3 in international notation

>First: I completely agree with Pieter's post. I appreciate Mr. Iwakura's
>efforts in providing us with essential information, but the last thing we
>need is yet another type of game notation. In Thomas Majewski's post there
>is also a non-standard game notation, so I think it is a good idea to give
>the 3rd game of the Meijin-sen in standard international notation:
>
>
>Reijer Grimbergen


Personally, I don't care which notation people use, anyway I'll figure it
out. But if everyone wants to stick with the international standard, no
problem. However Reijer, I would like to suggest that the way you list the
moves is hard to follow. Everything is too close together. Everytime I look
at the board and then back at the moves, I've lost my place on the list. So
I'd like to suggest that you spread things out a bit, stick with one move
per line--it makes it alot easier to find the next move when you're looking
back and forth. Thanks,
        Mike